There’s a group of moms that, honestly, I can’t condemn for wanting the best for their children. Unfortunately, their Korean mindset sometimes clashes with the educational system that we have in place at our school. Often these parents will push and push and push for more homework, more writing and more vocabulary assignments for their children. I call these parents the “Educational Soccer Moms.”
Last year, three parents of my middle children came to air their complains to the principal about how there wasn’t enough writing and vocabulary in my class. The principal discussed their concerns with me and I agreed the writing was lacking that year, but I planned to rectify that issue this year. The vocabulary, however, I told him would not change for various reasons and he agreed with me. So I compromised by offering the kids whose parents were complaining the option of doing extra vocabulary.
I sent home a letter the first week of school informing the three parents of the bonus work. About a week later, I received this email:
I’m thankful that my kid is going to ICS where Christian values are taught. I’m so grateful to see her grow in faith.
But many parents of ICS students are worried if our kids are being properly prepare for the universities in America and not falling behind. Korean middle school students and foreign language junior and high school students in Korea go through rigorous curriculums. Compare to other international schools in Korea and the schools in America, are our kids going through competitive curriculums?
Those of us three mothers who went to see Mr. L. (our principal) to voice our concerns didn’t intend just for our three kids to get the letter and extra vocabulary assignment each week.
We were hoping that the whole grade would work more and be upgraded.
I’m wondering how our concerns were convey to you by Mr.L.
P.S. I’m also sending this email to Mr. L. so that there wouldn’t be any misunderstandings.
I was a bit put off by the insinuation that she knew better how to run my class and what my kids could handle. I sent this reply:
Thank you for your concern about the vocabulary and writing development of your daughter’s class. I want to assure you that the issues you and the other mothers brought before Mr. L. at the end of last year did not fall on deaf ears.
As last year was my first year teaching, I had to figure out what worked best with my students. As the year progressed, I began to find what the methods that positively helped the students and which ones they weren’t responding to as well. Mr. F. (our director), Mr. L. and many of the teachers were great resources for teaching me how to teach. I have taken those lessons and that advice from last year and implemented them into my curriculum this year.
When you and the other mothers talked to Mr. L., it was expressed that there was not enough writing in my class last year. I admit that is an area that needed boosting and I plan on having more journal and paper writing worked into the class this year. You will hopefully begin to see those starting as soon as next week.
Mr. L. also told me about your concerns dealing with the amount of vocabulary being taught in my class. However, he told me that the crux of your visit seemed to be the writing issue and that vocabulary was a lesser concern and mostly something you desired for your own children. As a concession to this concern, I decided to offer the additional vocabulary to (the students).
As I explained in the letter I sent home, the reason I give only 10 vocabulary words a week is because I feel the majority of students in my class have better retention of the words when only 10 are given. My goal with vocabulary is to offer the students new, more expressive word choices they can use in daily conversation, so retention is key to the success of that goal.
I have students from all backgrounds in my classroom. Some are just out of ESL classes while others, like your daughter, have a high proficiency level and understanding of the English language. In general, not everyone is ready for additional words each week. Overloading my students with more words than they can accurately recall is defeating the purpose of vocabulary.
It is not wrong to have a high expectation for learning. But rote memorization is not learning; it is spouting off a list of words. I feel that to give most students 20 words a week would be feeding into this dangerous and non-productive trap. I could attempt to learn 50 words of Korean a day, but if I have no idea what they mean or the correct context in which to use them, they are useless to me. Same goes for English vocabulary. If the students hear 20 words a week, but never grasp what they mean because they get lost in the other words, then the point of learning is completely nullified.
I changed the format of my vocabulary quizzes because of this. I found their retention level was better when they were forced to use them in a contextual sentence form rather than just writing the vocabulary word in a blank next to the definition. I found that many students were just finding one key word in the definition as they studied (possibly for the first time since being introduced to the words) before class and connecting a vocabulary word with that keyword. If asked to use that word in a sentence or tell me what it meant a week later, many students could not because their method of study was flawed and their retention was, more often than not, nonexistent.
Two other barriers I’m facing are the school’s policy of 20 minutes of homework per night/class and the amount of class time I have to present the vocabulary. Many of my students tell me that the vocabulary assignments push the limits of homework time already. When I present the vocabulary words each week, I often times barely have enough time to present the new words during the already cramped class time. To add another 10 words to the mix would mean taking away from the other objectives in the class because I’d have to add another day of vocabulary to the schedule. I have told the students that are taking on the extra vocabulary assignment that the only time I will have to present these words to them are during their lunch period. Otherwise, they have to learn them on their own.
As we move into the literature section of the course, I will be expecting them to learn more of the words that are presented in conjunction with the stories they are reading. They will need to know these for the “Quests” (quiz-sized tests) and I expect the students to understand them to better comprehend the stories. So there will be more vocabulary offered to the entire class, but this will come once we finish the grammar portion of the class.
I have discussed this topic at length with the high school English teachers and they are both in agreement that I am presenting the vocabulary in a way that is best helping the students with retention as well as preparing them for high school level work. Mr. L. also gave his blessing to the path I’ve chosen to take with vocabulary.
I feel that what I am doing is the best method for learning and I have offered your daughter and the children of the other concerned parents the option of extra vocabulary because of the concerns brought before Mr. L. I am now planning on extending that option to more parents, but do not plan to make it a part of my regular course study. I have to look out for the well-being and learning capabilities of my students as a class, not as an individual.
Thank you again for your concerns and I hope to see your daughter, as well as all my students, thrive during this school year.
Today I received a polite email back from the parent stating that she now understood my concerns and the parents felt I would no longer be needing to teach their students the extra vocabulary at school, but that they would be learning them at home.
Now, I have to add that I wish some American parents would show this kind of initiative towards their child’s education. I feel that parents should be involved in their child’s education and not think that the only role they play is the person who puts them on the bus. My issue comes when a parent puts so much pressure on a child that they have to leave the room crying because they made a bad grade on a test. By the way… that “bad” grade was a 97. We call that the “Korean Fail.”
It’d be nice if I could somehow bottle the compromise and sell it to every parent of school-aged children, but it isn’t going to happen.
Otherwise… am I diplomatic or what???

